Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cooper Woestendick vs Jake Van Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Woestendick vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Cooper Woestendick vs Jake Van Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Woestendick 1 - 0 Emburgh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Woestendick has won 48.47% of points on his second serve, while Emburgh has won 40.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Woestendick, in recent form, has won 55.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 42.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.8% and 31.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Woestendick has saved 41.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 40.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Woestendick has won 50% of matches played (W/L 5/ 5), with Emburgh winning 48.94% (W/L 23/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Woestendick has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 51/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Woestendick has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 5/ 4), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Woestendick winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Woestendick winning 2 and Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Woestendick and Emburgh was at the M15 Vero Beach, 24-04-2024, First, Clay with Cooper Woestendick getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Woestendick and Emburgh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Woestendick winning 0 times and Emburgh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Woestendick winning 0, and Emburgh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Woestendick has played against opponents with an average rank of 94.7 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 107.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Woestendick has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Woestendick has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Woestendick 1 - 0 Emburgh
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
54% (7-6)
Career Total W/L
54% (73-63)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
21% (3-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Woestendick VS Emburgh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Cooper Woestendick | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (33/62) | 57% (44/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (22/33) | 57% (25/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 39% (13/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (39/77) | 40% (25/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Woestendick VS Emburgh H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cooper Woestendick | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 21% (3/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 21% (6/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (53/60) | 39% (112/174) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:44 | 1:20:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 157.83 | 96.93 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (196/359) | 62% (427/689) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (114/196) | 59% (253/427) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (79/163) | 41% (107/262) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (20/45) | 43% (20/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (155/363) | 36% (259/726) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 21% (3/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 21% (3/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Cooper Woestendick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Cooper Woestendick
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
William Grant
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Cooper Woestendick
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Cooper Woestendick
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
74)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 7-6(2) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Woestendick Vs Emburgh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
